DNA Forums: DNA Forums -> Migrations of the Slavs

Jump to content

Welcome to DNA Forums

Welcome to DNA Forums, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately, Register Now or Sign In.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Add events to our community calendar
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message © 2010 DevFuse
Subscribe to Distant Past        RSS Feed

Migrations of the Slavs

Icon 2 Comments
A new paper tackles the relationship between R1a1a and the Slavs. As I reported last November in A Slavic marker at last, the marker M458, defining haplogroup R1a1a7, was obviously Slavic, yet the report of its discovery by Underhill et al. said no such thing. They used the Zhivotovsky "evolutionary effective rate" for dating, which habitually overestimates ages by a factor of three.

But the new paper by Marcin Woźniak and colleagues, Similarities and Distinctions in Y Chromosome Gene Pool of Western Slavs, American Journal of Physical Anthropology dives right into the connection between R1a1a and the Slavs. Significantly it uses the Zhivotovsky dating method, but gives two results, the pedigree and evolutionary mutation rates.

The research was evidently done prior to the Underhill paper and does not use the SNP M458, let alone the more recently- discovered SNP L260, defining R1a1a7b - apparently the equivalent of the "P for Polish" haplotype discovered by Peter Gwozdz. So the authors mainly deal in haplotypes, though referring to the Underhill paper in their discussion section.

The importance of this paper lies in the way Woźniak weaves his discoveries into the archaeological evidence. It is brave to attempt this, since there remains so much disagreement over the ethnicity related to various archaeological cultures. I am currently trying to make sense of the movements of Goths and Slavs myself. So I won't comment at the moment. Instead I offer up a map from Philip's Atlas of World History showing the migrations of Slavs.
Attached Image


Here's a quick attempt to very roughly paste Slavic migrations over the distribution of R1a1a7 from Underhill et al.

Attached Image

2 Comments On This Entry

Page 1 of 1

Wojewoda 

06 July 2010 - 21:08 PM
It is possible that neither M458 is Slavic nor L260 is Polish. The dating and the distribution of both haplogroups suggest that M458 is representative for Bronze Age Lusatian culture and L260 for Iron Age Przeworsk culture:

http://dna-forums.co...post__p__187747

http://dna-forums.co...post__p__187765

http://dna-forums.co...post__p__190338

http://dna-forums.co...post__p__190344

http://dna-forums.co...post__p__192716


By the way Wozniak tried to link R1a1-WSL with Lusatian culture:

http://dna-forums.co...post__p__188178

Jean M 

06 July 2010 - 21:37 PM
Argument will go on until we have ancient DNA. I'll be doing my best with the evidence we have. :)
Page 1 of 1

September 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 7 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Recent Entries

Recent Comments